I had originally argued against Mike’s point that Bloggers should be considered journalists. I felt as though we need some kind of “real” news. News that you can trust. News that you can be confident is correct when you write a paper. However, I can see why college stresses the fact that you need to be a “Critical Thinker.” You need to double check what the TV is spoon feeding your brain, what the presenter is saying, and what you’re reading. You need to question before you believe.

Stating this, I have read an entry in a blog that made me a little sick. It simply furthers my point that you need to question whether or not news, which is purporting to be fact, is really true at all. That entry mentions a “Nobel Nominee” named Dr. Hammesfahr who believes Terri Schiavo is curable, moreover that he can cure her. If you read the article, it completely discredits him by doing a simple search on Google. The length at which the media is going through to place him in such high regard is completely wrong. What the media is doing is completely wrong.

I believe that Blogging will eventually (if not already) replace traditional Media outlets. Look at the job it’s doing right now. Rather sloppy if you ask me. Of course when CBS airs work that has not been examined thoroughly and it is critical of Bush, the Right tears it to shreds (including CBS itself). Dr. Hammesfahr is a nice play down center field for the Right. With all of this going on, I can see that the Media has become nothing more than entertainment. All it wants is to get a rise out of someone, something, or even a group of people. The Media is now the Jerry Springer of journalism.

The context in which I disagreed with Mike was about the Apple case that seemingly “threatened” journalists in America. My feelings on it were more like this.